Claude Skill for GEO audits

Claude Skill for GEO audits

SEO & AEO
TripleDart
Five parallel checks scored out of 20 apiece, which finishes in 8 to 15 minutes and produces a number you can put in front of a board.
Source
TripleDart
Tools
Claude, Search Console, schema validators
Runs
Quarterly
Cost
Free guide, API costs
Last updated
August 7, 2026

What it is.

Five checks run in parallel, each worth 20 points: AI citability, platform presence, technical infrastructure, content quality, and schema markup. The parallel design is why a full audit finishes in 8 to 15 minutes.

The output is a score out of 100 plus a two-tier action plan, split into quick wins and strategic investments. A worked example walks through what a 47 out of 100 looks like and what to do about it.

TripleDart's own guide, and it names our own platform. The scoring rubric works on its own.

What you get.

  • A score out of 100 built from five checks worth 20 points each.
  • A worked example at 47 out of 100, with the reasons behind each subscore.
  • A two-tier action plan splitting quick wins from longer investments.
  • The finding that FAQ schema is the single highest-impact improvement.
  • The same audit runnable against competitors, since it needs no internal access.
HOW TO USE IT

How to set it up.

1

Decide what each of the five checks means for your category before scoring anything.

2

Score citability and platform presence first, because those two need external data.

3

Check whether your review and profile pages are current, since a stale profile costs presence points.

4

Run the technical and schema checks against your top pages by traffic.

5

Sort the output into the two tiers and start with FAQ schema, named here as the highest-impact single change.

6

Re-score quarterly and track the number, since the score only means something as a series.

Use cases

Score a site out of a hundred

Run the five checks in parallel and read the total.

See what a low score looks like

Compare against the worked example and its reasoning.

Choose which check to work on

Take the weakest of the five as this quarter's project.

Best for

Reporting AI readiness upward

A score out of 100 travels through a board deck in a way a list of issues does not.

Comparing against competitors

Every check runs from outside, so a competitor scores the same way you do.

Prioritizing a backlog

The two-tier plan separates what fits this sprint from what needs a quarter.

Open the original.

Hosted on TripleDart, free to open.
Open the Tool

Questions about Claude Skill for GEO audits

Which checks do I run first?
Is the scoring weighted sensibly?
What does the score compare against?

Questions about SEO & AEO

Why does a young company score badly on GEO?
How often is a GEO audit worth repeating?
Strengths
  • Five checks at 20 points each makes the score inspectable, so a low number tells you where it came from.
  • The parallel design means the whole audit lands in 8 to 15 minutes.
  • It names FAQ schema as the highest-impact single change, which is an opinion you can act on.
Limitations
  • TripleDart's own guide, and it names our own platform as the execution layer.
  • An even 20 points per check assumes all five matter equally to your category, which is unlikely.
  • Platform presence checks depend on profiles being findable, so a young company scores low for reasons it cannot change quickly.
  • The score is only meaningful against your own history or a competitor, since there is no public benchmark.
Skip this if
  • Skip it if you already run GEO audits with a documented shape.
Ideal for
  • SEO leads
  • AI visibility owners
  • Stage: Series A onward

Want this running without building it yourself?

TripleDart has scaled 300+ tech companies with expert operators and AI workflows behind every play.