What it is.
The starting figure is a scan finding 74% of pages contained AI-generated content, with only about 26% purely human-written.
The interesting cut is the middle: 26% showed moderate AI use, 20% substantial, 16% AI-dominated, and only 2.5% were pure AI with no human involvement.
From there it argues where humans still hold an edge, naming original research, genuine experience, brand voice and editorial judgment.
What you get.
- The detection split, from 74% containing AI content down to 2.5% pure AI
- The four areas where human input still changes the outcome
- Why the quality objection to AI content is out of date
- What to hand to AI as commodity work
- Why workflows beat one-off prompts
- How to check whether the system is working
Read it at the source.
Read the guide
Is this just an opinion piece?
What does it say stays human?
How much web content is AI-generated?
What is the actual problem with AI content?
Does Google care how content was made?
What should stay human in a content system?