Smart lead qualification & routing from Typeform to HubSpot with data enrichment

Smart lead qualification & routing from Typeform to HubSpot with data enrichment

RevOps & Data
n8n
Adem Tasin's template adds the enrichment step before scoring, so you score on company size instead of guessing at fit.
Source
n8n
Tools
Typeform, Hunter.io, Abstract API, HubSpot
Runs
On form submit
Cost
Free template, enrichment credits
Last updated
August 7, 2026

What it is.

A webhook takes the Typeform submission, then Hunter.io and Abstract API fill in what the form did not ask for. A scoring step runs on the enriched record, and the result routes into HubSpot with Slack and Google Sheets kept in step.

Enrich first, then score. A form you can keep to three fields produces a better-qualified record than a nine-field form nobody finishes.

What you get.

  • A Typeform webhook trigger with the field extraction already wired.
  • Enrichment through Hunter.io and Abstract API before any scoring happens.
  • Scoring logic you edit, running on the enriched record.
  • Routing into HubSpot, with a Slack alert and a Google Sheets log alongside.
  • A shape that works with any form tool that posts a webhook.
HOW TO USE IT

How to set it up.

1

Send one test submission and note the exact field keys, since the extraction step depends on them.

2

Add Hunter.io and Abstract API credentials and check what each returns for a domain you know.

3

Write your scoring rules against the enriched fields, since that's why you enriched them.

4

Map the enriched fields onto HubSpot properties, including the ones you want for later segmentation.

5

Set the Slack alert to fire only above your qualification threshold.

6

Cut your form down once enrichment is working, since fewer fields means more submissions.

Use cases

Enrich before you score

Add the company data first so the score is not guessing from an email.

Route on a score you can trust

Send the qualified ones onward and hold the rest.

Wire a form in an afternoon

Use the trigger with field extraction already built.

Best for

Short forms with high standards

Ask for an email, enrich the rest, and keep the qualification bar where it was.

Inbound that arrives unqualified

Scoring on a raw form is guesswork; scoring on an enriched record is a decision.

Teams without an enrichment platform

Two API keys covers most of what a seat-priced enrichment tool does here.

Open the original.

Hosted on n8n, free to open.
Open the Tool

Questions about Smart lead qualification & routing from Typeform to HubSpot with data enrichment

What does enrichment cost per form fill?
How reliable is the enrichment?
Are the scoring rules usable?

Questions about RevOps & Data

Should qualification happen on the form or after it?
What do you do with a lead enrichment can't match?
Strengths
  • Enrichment runs before scoring, so you can keep the form short and the bar high.
  • It writes to HubSpot, Slack, and Sheets in one pass, so nothing needs reconciling later.
  • Both enrichment services are named, so you can price a run before building.
Limitations
  • Hunter.io and Abstract API both bill per lookup, so a spike in form fills costs money.
  • Enrichment match rates fall on small companies and personal email domains, so the score will be thin for those.
  • The scoring rules are the author's, so they need replacing with your own definition of fit.
Skip this if
  • Skip it if you already enrich before scoring and route on the result.
Ideal for
  • Demand gen managers
  • RevOps leads
  • Stage: Seed to Series B

Want this running without building it yourself?

TripleDart has scaled 300+ tech companies with expert operators and AI workflows behind every play.